Wearable technologies change due to new medical devices regulations

Wearable technologies change due to new medical devices regulations

Wearable technologies, eHealth and telemedicine might significantly change due to two newly adopted European regulations on medical devices.

I have already discussed about the privacy issues as well as the issues relating to the qualification as a medical device of wearables in this blog post. But this is an article from my colleague Sara Balice (initially published on IPTItaly) that outlines an interesting development of the matter.

The new European regulations on medical devices

In the market of medical devices the exploration of wearable technologies is growing at a rapid pace and regulations need to adapt accordingly.

To meet this need, on 5 April 2017 two new EU regulations on medical devices have been adopted:

  • Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices, and
  • Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (“IVDR“)

Both regulations have been published a few days ago on the Official Journal of the European Union (available here).

The new Regulations

will help to ensure that all medical devices – from heart valves to sticking plasters to artificial hips – are safe and perform well

according to what stated by the European Commission in a press release.

They will provide significant changes in the concerned sector and they will have an impact also on wearable technology in medical devices.

How wearable technologies qualify under the new medical devices regulations?

Directive 2007/47/EC (amending Directive 90/385/EEC and Directive 93/42/EEC concerning, respectively, active implantable medical devices and medical devices) already clarified that software, when specifically intended by the manufacturer to be used for one or more of the medical purposes is a medical device, whilst software for general purposes when used in a healthcare setting is not a medical device.

Medical purposes are

  • diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease,
  • diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of or compensation for an injury or a disability,
  • investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or of a physiological process,
  • control of conception.

The Medical Devices Regulation goes further and specifies that software shall also be deemed to be an “active device“, i.e.

any device, the operation of which depends on a source of energy other than that generated by the human body for that purpose, or by gravity, and which acts by changing the density of or converting that energy”.

The Medical Devices Regulation also provides rules for software classification as medical devices. The classification of medical devices is a progressive risk-based system, taking into account the potential risks associated with the devices.

Under the regulation, software are generally in class I, i.e. less critical devices. However,

  • software which provides information used to take diagnostic / therapeutic decisions is in class IIa, except if such decisions can have a serious impact on patient health, in which case the classification will be class III or IIb; and
  • software intended to monitor physiological processes is in class IIa, except if intended to monitor vital physiological parameters, where the nature of variations is such that it could result in immediate danger to the patient, in which case it is in class IIb.

Depending on classification, software medical devices, including wearable technologies, are subject to stricter safety rules and conformity assessment.

The impact of the wider definition of “accessories” on wearables

The Medical Devices Regulation broadens the scope of the definition of “accessories” including articles which, whilst not being themselves medical devices, are intended by their manufacturer to specifically and directly assist the medical functionality other medical devices in their intended purpose. And the regulation specifies that accessories shall be treated as medical devices in their own right.

Software of wearable technologies may therefore qualify either as a device or an accessory, with the consequence of being subject to the rules set forth by Medical Devices Regulation.

What are the next steps?

Medical Devices  Regulation and the Regulation on in vitro diagnostic medical devices shall enter into force on the twentieth day after their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and will be applicable, respectively, in three and five years.

So no immediate actions are required for manufacturers and supply chain operators. However, changes are significant and manufacturers and other participants in the supply chain should be aware as of now of the new rules and their respective responsibilities in order to be able to adapt in time.

Advertisements
Your smartwatch is a medical device?

Your smartwatch is a medical device?

Wearable technology issues relating to the potential qualification of such products as a medical devices have become popular on the press following the presentation of the first smartphone with a heart rate sensor, quickly followed by the smartwatch and the smartbracelet with the same functionality.  During the same days UK authorities took an unexpected position on mobile apps aimed at controlling or monitor users’ health which might impact the Internet of Things sector.  Continue reading

Interview at Sensoria Fitness wearable technology creator, Davide Viganò!

Interview at Sensoria Fitness wearable technology creator, Davide Viganò!

I had the pleasure to interview for my law firm’s fashion law magazine Law à la Mode, Davide Viganò, the CEO of Heapsylon, the creators of the wearable technology Sensoria Fitness that might change the Internet of Things sector! Davide is a very interesting person and is Italian (which is even better!) living in Seattle, I hope you will enjoy the interview. Continue reading

Wearable technologies – Patentability of hand gestures?

Wearable technologies – Patentability of hand gestures?

$ 3 billion will be spent in 2014 on 10 million units of wearable technologies according to a Deloitte report, but the potentials of this market can be seen also through the attempts by tech companies to patent anything connected to them, including the heart gesture made in front of Google Glasses so setting a new approach for the Internet of Things!   Continue reading

Wearables face privacy issues!

Wearables face privacy issues!

Wearable technologies and the Internet of Things are one of the most discussed at the moment with a considerable potential impact on our approach to technologies in the next years. But, with the huge amount of personal data relating to users as well as images/sounds on the people/events around him collected by means of such devices and the possibility to very easily share them on the Internet, the impact on privacy rights of these technologies will require a careful review. Continue reading