Wearable technologies change due to new medical devices regulations

Wearable technologies change due to new medical devices regulations

Wearable technologies, eHealth and telemedicine might significantly change due to two newly adopted European regulations on medical devices.

I have already discussed about the privacy issues as well as the issues relating to the qualification as a medical device of wearables in this blog post. But this is an article from my colleague Sara Balice (initially published on IPTItaly) that outlines an interesting development of the matter.

The new European regulations on medical devices

In the market of medical devices the exploration of wearable technologies is growing at a rapid pace and regulations need to adapt accordingly.

To meet this need, on 5 April 2017 two new EU regulations on medical devices have been adopted:

  • Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices, and
  • Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices (“IVDR“)

Both regulations have been published a few days ago on the Official Journal of the European Union (available here).

The new Regulations

will help to ensure that all medical devices – from heart valves to sticking plasters to artificial hips – are safe and perform well

according to what stated by the European Commission in a press release.

They will provide significant changes in the concerned sector and they will have an impact also on wearable technology in medical devices.

How wearable technologies qualify under the new medical devices regulations?

Directive 2007/47/EC (amending Directive 90/385/EEC and Directive 93/42/EEC concerning, respectively, active implantable medical devices and medical devices) already clarified that software, when specifically intended by the manufacturer to be used for one or more of the medical purposes is a medical device, whilst software for general purposes when used in a healthcare setting is not a medical device.

Medical purposes are

  • diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or alleviation of disease,
  • diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, alleviation of or compensation for an injury or a disability,
  • investigation, replacement or modification of the anatomy or of a physiological process,
  • control of conception.

The Medical Devices Regulation goes further and specifies that software shall also be deemed to be an “active device“, i.e.

any device, the operation of which depends on a source of energy other than that generated by the human body for that purpose, or by gravity, and which acts by changing the density of or converting that energy”.

The Medical Devices Regulation also provides rules for software classification as medical devices. The classification of medical devices is a progressive risk-based system, taking into account the potential risks associated with the devices.

Under the regulation, software are generally in class I, i.e. less critical devices. However,

  • software which provides information used to take diagnostic / therapeutic decisions is in class IIa, except if such decisions can have a serious impact on patient health, in which case the classification will be class III or IIb; and
  • software intended to monitor physiological processes is in class IIa, except if intended to monitor vital physiological parameters, where the nature of variations is such that it could result in immediate danger to the patient, in which case it is in class IIb.

Depending on classification, software medical devices, including wearable technologies, are subject to stricter safety rules and conformity assessment.

The impact of the wider definition of “accessories” on wearables

The Medical Devices Regulation broadens the scope of the definition of “accessories” including articles which, whilst not being themselves medical devices, are intended by their manufacturer to specifically and directly assist the medical functionality other medical devices in their intended purpose. And the regulation specifies that accessories shall be treated as medical devices in their own right.

Software of wearable technologies may therefore qualify either as a device or an accessory, with the consequence of being subject to the rules set forth by Medical Devices Regulation.

What are the next steps?

Medical Devices  Regulation and the Regulation on in vitro diagnostic medical devices shall enter into force on the twentieth day after their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union and will be applicable, respectively, in three and five years.

So no immediate actions are required for manufacturers and supply chain operators. However, changes are significant and manufacturers and other participants in the supply chain should be aware as of now of the new rules and their respective responsibilities in order to be able to adapt in time.

Internet of Things: Business and Legal Framework Webinar

Internet of Things: Business and Legal Framework Webinar

he DLA Piper Internet of Things group just launched a series of webinars on legal and business issues of the Internet of Things.  The first webinar will cover the Business and Legal Framework of the Internet of Things and will take place on Wednesday 22 April 2015 from 3.00 to 4.00pm UK time. Continue reading

The Internet of Things will “rock” the retail sector

The Internet of Things will “rock” the retail sector

The Internet of Things will generate in the retail sector US $ 329 billion of revenues by 2018 according to a report published by SAP, but such massive growth has to deal with legal issues concerning not only privacy compliance and cybersecurity, but also among others product liability. Continue reading

The Internet will disappear with the Internet of Things?

The Internet will disappear with the Internet of Things?

The Internet of Things will make the Internet disappear according to Eric Schmidt of Google.  The Internet will become part of any object around us collecting personal data in a seemless manner which might lead to privacy issues that regulators shall properly address. Continue reading

The best Internet of Things articles for 2014 are…

The best Internet of Things articles for 2014 are…

2014 is just over and it is time to wish happy New Year and thank all the readers of IoTLaw for following with such interest this blog!  But it is also time to check which have been the best articles of 2014. Continue reading

Top 5 Internet of Things predictions for 2015

Top 5 Internet of Things predictions for 2015

Internet of Things has been the centre of the attention of the global market during 2014 and everyone is curious to see what will happen in 2015. Here is my personal list of predictions relating to legal issues that will affect the Internet of Things in 2015! Continue reading

Right time for Internet of Things regulations?

Right time for Internet of Things regulations?

Internet of Things technologies are already all around us and with a market that is expected to reach a value of more than $ 14.4 trillion over the next decade with 50 billion connected devices by 2020, the question is whether ad hoc regulations are necessary to govern the Internet of Things sector.  Continue reading